4/7/2023 0 Comments Daniel k driver![]() The SoundBlaster Live! was not PCI 2.1 complainant. or SoundBlaster 512, they had many names for it). Finally giving up Creative bought another company that had made a PCI soundcard and slapped the SoundBlaster brand on it. The AWE was better but it was basically what the SB16 should have been and the competition by this time made the AWE look silly - and that is not mentioning the rather dishonest 64 simultaneous channels claim their marketing department threw about.Ĭreative's first attempt at a PCI soundcard turned out so murky that 1997 era mobos have something called a "SoundBlaster link" to make them happy. It can indeed play back 16-Bit samples, but the drivers simply down converts them to 12-bits. Despite what you may believe the SB16 is NOT a 16-Bit soundcard. The fact that the follow up - the Sound Blaster 16 - was NOT Sound Blaster Pro compatible is a clear indication how murky the SB Pro's underpinnings actually were. The Soundblaster pro was better, but that's not saying a lot. ![]() Problem was the implementation was so broken it was impossible to play back audio without crackles and pops. ![]() The original SoundBlaster was basically a copy of the Adlib (a soundcard by a small American company) with digital output tacked on. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |